The gap between those who can access and use digital technology and those who can't
What makes a government truly ideal? Is it the wisdom of its rulers, the happiness of its citizens, or the justice of its laws? This timeless question has been asked by many over the course of centuries, and has invited reflection from the greatest minds in political philosophy. From the idealism of ancient thinkers to reformists during the Enlightenment, humanity has never ceased imagining better systems of governance.
But the debate didn’t end in the past—it evolved. Today, theories like utilitarianism, libertarianism, socialism, and modern democracy shape our global political landscape. While no single theory can claim universal truth, each one does offer distinct answers to the complex needs of societies.
How can these diverse perspectives potentially help humanity create the ideal form of government? Click through this gallery to find out.
Throughout history, generations of thinkers have wrestled with governance's ideal form. They have offered timeless insights and have proposed possible governments rooted in logic, fairness, freedom, or collective well-being.
The famous Greek philosopher Plato imagined an ideal society ruled by philosopher-kings (leaders of immense wisdom and virtue) who would prioritize justice and harmony over personal gain or political power.
His vision emphasized that reason and knowledge should lead governance; only the most enlightened individuals could rule justly and resist temptations that typically corrupt power structures.
By trusting leaders who rise through philosophical understanding, Plato believed societies could move beyond flawed governance systems and build communities where fairness and peace are institutionalized values.
Aristotle, on the other hand, proposed a more practical alternative. He advocated for a constitutional system that blended oligarchy and democracy. This would prevent either rich or poor from wielding excessive control over the political process.
Aristotle feared extremes and suggested that stable governance required a mixture of class powers, which would ensure that policies reflected a fair middle ground between elite control and mass opinion.
During the Age of Enlightenment (17th to 19th centuries), thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke introduced the idea that governments derive authority from the people through a social contract that ensures basic freedoms and rights for every citizen.
Locke argued that a just government must be consensual, existing to protect life, liberty, and property. These basic rights must never be violated by the state or neglected under any system.
Rousseau introduced the concept of the “general will,” which suggests that true democracy comes from collective decisions that reflect the shared interests of all and not just those who have the most power.
In the 18th and 19th centuries, utilitarian philosophers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill claimed that an ideal government must promote policies that increase overall happiness while reducing suffering.
Bentham believed that actions are honorable if they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This perspective has deeply shaped policy thinking, especially around welfare and justice.
In practice, utilitarian governments prioritize programs like public health, education, and poverty reduction, since these initiatives increase collective well-being and reduce human suffering across different groups.
The utilitarian model envisions a world where laws and institutions are structured to ensure the majority of people live happy, meaningful lives, with minimal pain or oppression from authority.
Despite its appeal, utilitarianism has flaws. It’s incredibly difficult to predict which policies will maximize happiness, especially when people’s interests or emotional responses are complex and unpredictable.
Utilitarianism can justify violating individual rights (such as banning smoking) if doing so appears to benefit more people. Many thinkers have rejected utilitarianism because of the concerns it raises about freedom.
Despite critiques, however, utilitarianism still offers a very grounded and usable gauge to assess whether government policies are actually improving people’s lives.
Another theory with its own views is libertarianism, which sees ideal government as one that interferes as little as possible. Libertarians believe that individuals should be permitted to live freely so long as their actions don’t harm others in meaningful ways.
American philosopher Robert Nozick argued that the world should be made up of ‘night-watchman’ governments that exist only to protect against force, fraud, and violations of voluntary agreements between people.
In a libertarian world, the economy and society are shaped by personal choice and free contracts, with government stepping in only to resolve genuine cases of coercion or deception.
Opponents of libertarianism argue that without government support for essentials like health and education, freedom becomes meaningless for those who cannot afford basic opportunities or protections.
Socialism presents another vision: a society where resources are shared, services are public, and every person has equal access to healthcare, education, and political influence.
Socialist systems advocate for state or collective ownership of major industries, distributing wealth fairly and eliminating privilege based on economic status to create a just and equal society.
Ideal socialism involves decisions made through participatory means, whether via voting or community councils. This ensures that political power isn’t concentrated among elites, but shared among all citizens.
The Soviet Union and Cuba attempted full-scale socialism, but their experiences were mixed. While aiming for equality, they often faced practical hurdles, including inefficiency and tendencies for leaders to slip into authoritarianism.
Despite the critiques, many people remain inspired by socialism’s core idea: a just society where wealth and opportunity are not luxuries for the few but guaranteed for everyone.
Modern democratic theory holds that a legitimate government should exist only thanks to the consent of the governed. Elections, civil rights, and legal accountability are all at the foundational core of democracy.
There are two types of democracy: direct and representative. Direct democracy empowers citizens to vote directly on policies, while representative democracy elects officials to act on behalf of the public. Both of these are meant to reflect the will of the people.
Modern democracies face many challenges such as corruption and populism, both of which can erode institutions and threaten minority rights when leaders manipulate popular opinion for unchecked power.
Despite these problems, political theorists are developing new ideas to preserve democratic ideals while improving resilience against manipulation and enhancing responsiveness to the ever-changing needs of voters.
Digital democracy has started taking hold in society, where online technology offers transparency and allows people to see what officials are doing. In the future, artificial intelligence systems may very well streamline the democratic process for humanity and create systems of governance that help everyone.
Ultimately, there is no end-all answer to what an ideal government is, especially since theorists and philosophers have vastly differing opinions on what counts as ideal. The quest continues, but it’s never been more important to remain critical as we move forward.
Sources: (TheCollector) (Britannica)
See also: What is infinity?
What makes an ideal government, according to philosophy
How politics has struggled to create the perfect leaders
LIFESTYLE Politics
What makes a government truly ideal? Is it the wisdom of its rulers, the happiness of its citizens, or the justice of its laws? This timeless question has been asked by many over the course of centuries, and has invited reflection from the greatest minds in political philosophy. From the idealism of ancient thinkers to reformists during the Enlightenment, humanity has never ceased imagining better systems of governance.
But the debate didn’t end in the past—it evolved. Today, theories like utilitarianism, libertarianism, socialism, and modern democracy shape our global political landscape. While no single theory can claim universal truth, each one does offer distinct answers to the complex needs of societies.
How can these diverse perspectives potentially help humanity create the ideal form of government? Click through this gallery to find out.