Art, obsession, and identity
Occam’s razor is a philosophical principle that prioritizes simplicity. It suggests that when someone is faced with different explanations for a phenomenon, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. The principle values clarity and eliminates unnecessary complexity in reasoning.
The principle is named after William of Ockham, a 14th-century philosopher, theologian, and logician. His bold ideas on simplicity (combined with his rather controversial political writings) carved his reputation as both a pioneer of logic and a dissenter of the Church.
Unlike other medieval thinkers, Ockham was rebellious. His criticism of societal norms led many to accuse him of heresy and also threaten him with excommunication and exile. Ockham was also a nominalist, which means that he believed there are no such things as metaphysical universals (the common characteristics that bind some things together).
Occam's philosophy of nominalism denies that universal truths like "redness" or "beauty" exist. It sees such “universals” as mere labels based on experience and language. This challenges the realist perspective, which says that such characteristics are inherent truths of the universe.
In the Middle Ages, many philosophers and theologians debated whether abstract qualities like beauty existed outside the human mind. Realists believed that this was the case, while nominalists (like Ockham) viewed them as nothing more than constructs of language and thought.
The nature of universals had major ramifications for theology. Realists argued that divine attributes like goodness were universal truths that came from God, but nominalists argued that such concepts were just mental constructs. Naturally, this challenged traditional ideas of what was considered divine moral authority.
Nominalist arguments, like Ockham’s, were seen as unacceptable and dangerous in medieval times. By questioning divine justification for moral truths, these ideas threatened the Church’s authority and opened the door to different interpretations of morality and religion.
Despite his nominalism, Ockham viewed God as the only necessary being. He acknowledged that abstract qualities existed, but argued that they did not exist outside the mind.
For William of Ockham, abstract qualities existed only as constructs of thought. They were fictional in nature, products of human cognition rather than external realities.
Although the principle is attributed to Ockham, it wasn’t explicitly called a “razor” in his writings. The modern phrasing “Don’t multiply entities beyond necessity” aligns with his philosophy. Yet, it was introduced three centuries later by John Punch, an Irish Franciscan friar.
Ockham’s original principle emphasized that people should avoid making unnecessary assumptions. He stated that characteristics (like beauty) should only be asserted if it is self-evident or justified by scripture. This philosophical caution aimed to help people use strong evidence while reasoning about something’s existence.
The term “Occam’s razor” was popularized in the 17th century by John Punch, who likened the principle’s role to slicing through unnecessary parts of metaphysics, much like a razor would.
Occam’s razor naturally aligns with scientific practice. When scientists choose between different scientific theories, simplicity often equals plausibility. The famous astronomer Galileo, for example, preferred the astronomy conducted by Copernicus rather than that conducted by Ptolemy, the latter which relied on excessive assumptions of the cosmos.
Galileo’s endorsement of simpler explanations reflected Ockham’s principle. He favored the heliocentric model of the solar system (which places the Sun at the center rather than the Earth) due to its elegance and coherence. In favoring this, he inadvertently applied the razor to challenge the excessive complexity of other astronomical theories.
During the Enlightenment (17th to 18th centuries), Occam’s razor became a key tool in experimental inquiry, separating speculative metaphysics from evidence-based science. It encouraged philosophers and scientists to provide disciplined explanations for phenomena with minimal assumptions about existence.
French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794) applied Occam’s razor to debunk the phlogiston theory, which suggested that whenever chemicals combusted, a mysterious substance was released (known as phlogiston). By proving the theory wrong through experiments, Lavoisier advanced modern chemistry and eliminated unnecessary assumptions.
Phlogiston, a hypothetical substance, is a good example of how scientists once made pointless speculation. Lavoisier’s evidence-based work revealed that combustion involved oxygen, not phlogiston, showcasing Occam’s razor in action to refine scientific understanding.
While influential, Occam’s razor faces criticism. Some argue its preference for simplicity may overlook complex but essential aspects of the world, potentially sacrificing truth for elegance in scientific and philosophical theories.
Critics argue that favoring simpler explanations may reflect a human bias, since our cognitive limits might lead us to overlook complex truths. This highlights the importance of balancing simplicity with thoroughness when using Occam's razor in science and philosophy.
In AI, Occam’s razor helps combat overfitting by encouraging the creation of simpler models that generalize better. This principle guides the development of efficient systems, making it a valuable tool in advancing the field.
The principle aligns with AI’s goal of balancing simplicity and functionality. Reducing unnecessary complexity in AI algorithms makes it easier to interpret, which enables better decision-making for these systems.
Overfitting happens when AI models become too tailored to training data, losing the ability to generalize for broader audiences. Occam’s razor promotes simpler models that focus on meaningful patterns, which improves both accuracy and efficiency.
In philosophy, Occam’s razor promotes clarity by discouraging people from making unnecessary speculation. Ultimately, people are invited to focus on building coherent arguments in their own lives that are based on evidence rather than abstract feelings and beliefs.
Occam’s razor transcends philosophy, influencing diverse fields such as biology, physics, and cognitive science. Its universal applicability means that it has a major role as a guiding principle for a majority of rational thought.
Be warned, however: effective application of Occam’s razor requires balance. If one were to overzealously simplify the world, it risks distorting truth. But at the same time, excessive complexity can hinder understanding. The trick is to achieve clarity without sacrificing depth.
In everyday problem-solving, the razor’s preference for simplicity can streamline any person’s decision-making. By focusing on the most straightforward explanations, individuals can enhance their efficiency and clarity in addressing real-world challenges.
In an era of information overload and intricate systems, Occam’s razor offers a counterbalance. Its call for simplicity can help humanity navigate complexity. This makes it an indispensable tool for modern thinkers.
Occam’s razor endures as a cornerstone of rational thought. Its emphasis on clarity and simplicity continues to shape scientific inquiry, philosophical reasoning, and everyday decision-making, proving its timeless relevance across centuries and disciplines.
Sources: (TheCollector) (New Scientist) (Britannica) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
See also: Why are Greek and Roman myths depicted in famous Christian art?
The principle of Occam’s razor (also spelled Ockham’s razor) is, at its core, about simplicity. It can basically be summarized as “the simplest explanation is usually the best,” and the principle has become a cornerstone of logical reasoning, scientific inquiry, and philosophical thought.
Rooted in the ideas of a 14th-century philosopher and theologian, this principle champions simplicity over complexity, urging people to avoid unnecessary assumptions and convoluted theories. While its origins lie in medieval debates, Occam’s razor has transcended its historical context and influenced much of the modern world.
But what exactly is it? And why does this timeless principle continue to guide thinkers to seek clarity? Click through this gallery to find all there is to know about this philosophical concept and how it could apply to anyone’s life.
What is Occam’s razor?
This principle is all about simplicity in all parts of life
LIFESTYLE Philosophy
The principle of Occam’s razor (also spelled Ockham’s razor) is, at its core, about simplicity. It can basically be summarized as “the simplest explanation is usually the best,” and the principle has become a cornerstone of logical reasoning, scientific inquiry, and philosophical thought.
Rooted in the ideas of a 14th-century philosopher and theologian, this principle champions simplicity over complexity, urging people to avoid unnecessary assumptions and convoluted theories. While its origins lie in medieval debates, Occam’s razor has transcended its historical context and influenced much of the modern world.
But what exactly is it? And why does this timeless principle continue to guide thinkers to seek clarity? Click through this gallery to find all there is to know about this philosophical concept and how it could apply to anyone’s life.