© Shutterstock

Fears of nuclear war -

Since the start of the Russo-Ukrainian War in 2022, and subsequent geopolitical tensions, fears of a nuclear war have prompted many to question what a nuclear conflict would mean for humanity and the planet.

© Shutterstock

Devastating consequences -

A nuclear conflict would have devastating consequences, from initial deaths in the direct blasts to the lingering effects of radiation.

© Shutterstock

Widespread technological collapse -

There would also be a collapse of technology, even in locations considered most likely to survive. This would seriously impede cooperation, coordination, and resilient food production.

© Shutterstock

Some 63% of the world’s population would die of famine -

According to a study by Rutgers University, more than five billion people, roughly 63% of the world's current population, would die of famine in the aftermath of a full-scale nuclear war.

© Shutterstock

A 97% reduction in food production -

A nuclear war would also result in a 97% reduction in food production in China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US.

© Shutterstock

Survivors even in the most severe scenario -

Nevertheless, there would likely be survivors around the world, even in the most severe of scenarios.

© Shutterstock

The best chance of survival -

Of course, those in the most resilient of nations would stand the best chance of avoiding a total collapse. But you might not guess the countries we're talking about!

© Shutterstock

The study compared 38 island countries -

The study published in Risk Analysis compared 38 island countries on 13 factors they said could predict success as a post-apocalyptic survival state.

© Shutterstock

Important factors -

The factors included food production, energy self-sufficiency, manufacturing, and the disaster's effect on climate, among other points.

© Shutterstock

Safe for an "abrupt sunlight-reducing catastrophe" -

According to the study, the narrowed-down island countries are capable of producing enough food for their populations after an "abrupt sunlight‐reducing catastrophe," such as a nuclear war, super volcano, or asteroid strike.

© Shutterstock

Indonesia, the Philippines, and Mauritius -

At the bottom of the list of best countries to survive a nuclear war are the island nations of the Philippines, Mauritius, and Indonesia.

© Shutterstock

Indonesia, the Philippines, and Mauritius -

According to the study, these nations would be able to produce enough food in the aftermath of a nuclear war.

© Shutterstock

Indonesia, the Philippines, and Mauritius -

Diverse archipelagos likely harbor some islands that are individually self-sufficient. Plus, there's potential for persisting regional trade between Indonesia and the Philippines.

© Shutterstock

Social instability puts resilience in doubt -

However, the history of corruption and social instability in these nations could put their resilience in doubt, according to the study.

© Shutterstock

Solomon Islands and Vanuatu -

Looking at Oceania, residents on small island nations like the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu will most certainly survive. This is largely thanks to their tropical geography and abundant food production in ordinary times.

© Shutterstock

Solomon Islands and Vanuatu -

However, both nations lack a high-technology manufacturing and knowledge economy, which would make it difficult for them to get back on their feet. Nevertheless, they could potentially participate in trade with other surviving nearby nations.

© Shutterstock

Iceland -

Iceland, the only nation in the Northern Hemisphere in the study, is also one of the safest nuclear war zones. This is largely due its remoteness.

© Shutterstock

Iceland -

However, with a small economy, Iceland would likely suffer from a lack of imported commodities and infrastructure degradation.

© Shutterstock

Iceland -

However, Iceland may have access to North America and Europe, if some of the countries in these continents aren't completely devastated by war, famine, and/or social collapse.

© Shutterstock

New Zealand -

New Zealand comes in second place thanks to its distance from nuclear targets and its longstanding nuclear-free status.

© Shutterstock

New Zealand -

The nation's resilience in the event of an abrupt drop in global temperature prompted by a period of darkness would also help. Everywhere in New Zealand is relatively close to the ocean, cushioning it from extreme temperatures.

© Shutterstock

New Zealand -

Also, New Zealand has an efficient food export economy that could feed their population multiple times over just from exports.

© Shutterstock

New Zealand -

According to the study, even in the event of a 61% reduction in crops during a prolonged nuclear winter, New Zealanders would still have enough to eat.

© Shutterstock

Australia -

Given its rugged outback and its history of being settled by convicts, there's long been this mythos that Australia can survive anything. Well, it seems there's some truth to it, even if unrelated! Yup, Australia topped the list.

© Shutterstock

Australia -

A robust agricultural producer, the study found that Australia's food supply buffer is gigantic, with the potential to feed many tens of millions of extra people.

© Shutterstock

Australia -

Also, Australia's good infrastructure, vast energy surplus, high health security, and defense budget all helped in placing it at the top of the list.

© Shutterstock

Australia -

But according to the study, Australia has one major factor working against it: its relatively close military ties with the UK and US make it more likely to become a target in a nuclear war against Russia.

Sources: (The Guardian)

See also: What to do if a worst-case nuclear scenario actually happens

© Shutterstock