© Getty Images

Steps against AI -

The creative industry is taking big steps to counter AI and its reproduction and circulation of human work. 

© Getty Images

Illusion of uniqueness -

For many years, creatives believed their jobs were too unique to be threatened by AI programs and technology.

© Getty Images

Automated alternatives -

In other sectors, however, workers have long faced fears that their jobs could be replaced by cheaper, automated systems—likely similar to the fears brought on by industrialization generations ago.

© Getty Images

Regurgitated -

Now, much to the surprise of creatives, their work and creative outputs are being absorbed into AI algorithms and regurgitated for further commercial use.

© Getty Images

Legal framework -

Artists, writers, and other creative figures have started a massive push to question the legal framework that allows their work to be used by AI generative platforms.

© Getty Images

Mechanisms -

At the forefront is the need to develop greater mechanisms to understand how and where content is being pulled from, as well as the enactment of more protective legislation, 

© Getty Images

Visual artists -

Perhaps the loudest movement, or the group that has received the greatest attention, is that of the visual artists, who have been quite deliberate in their positions from the very start.

© Getty Images

Enraged -

But other creatives have also expressed their dismay. Writers, musicians, narrators, and actors, among other groups of creatives, are enraged.

© Getty Images

Narrators and authors -

Voice-cloning technology is putting narrators and actors out of work, as their voices are contractually tied into permissions for machine learning.

© Getty Images

Google and Amazon -

Since 2021, Google has been issuing books narrated by algorithms. Amazon has regularly done so since 2023. This, narrators argue, amounts to theft.

© Getty Images

Susie Alegre -

Susie Alegre, British author and human rights lawyer, believes that AI generative platforms are actually robbing people of “a sense of achievement.”

© Getty Images

Undermining authentic thinking -

By facilitating intellectual work through AI, Alegre believes that “the value of authentic thinking has already been undermined.”

© Getty Images

Piracy -

When we think about the great debates regarding the reproduction of literature and different forms of writing, piracy certainly comes to mind.

© Getty Images

Piracy channels -

In the last several decades, since the more widespread use of the internet, many different piracy channels that allow access to creative works for free have been created, but not without legal retaliation. 

© Getty Images

Illicit access -

Platforms offering illicit ways to access films, TV shows, books, and scientific articles, among other resources, have all been targeted in terms of individual outrage and legislative support.

© Getty Images

Software innovation -

But writers aren’t so concerned about piracy now that their work is being translated into some sort of software innovation initiative.

© Getty Images

Jane Friedman -

An interesting case is that of the author Jane Friedman, who had written 10 books, primarily guiding writers through the publishing process.

© Getty Images

New works -

Over the last few years, people began to reach out to her regarding new works that were being published under her name.

© Shutterstock

Garbage books -

A series of what Friedman refers to as “garbage books” have been published under her name. The issue is, she did not produce them.

© Shutterstock

AI texts -

The AI-generated texts hold titles similar to her work but are not written, reviewed, or produced with her involvement in any way.

© Shutterstock

Amazon -

Published under AI innovation and commercial giant, Amazon, Friedman naturally contacted Amazon to report the issue and have the books taken down.

© Getty Images

Trademark issues -

Unfortunately, Friedman didn’t hold a trademark to her own name, so a copyright infringement case was nearly impossible.

© Shutterstock

Copyright -

The fight against what Friedman calls “reverse plagiarism” is the key battle that authors are facing. Basing AI works on the work of human authors is, technically, not copyright infringement.

© Shutterstock

Author's Guild -

Friedman is far from the only author experiencing these tribulations. While groups like the Author's Guild have been working to back authors in their legal confrontations, AI continues to reproduce their works.

© Shutterstock

Exploitation -

Meaning, as the legal battle continues playing out, the exploitation of creative work also continues simultaneously.

© Getty Images

Mockery -

Singer-songwriter Nick Cave was presented with an AI-generated set of lyrics based on his music. Horrified, he called it “a grotesque mockery of what it is to be human.”

© Getty Images

Conceding rational agency -

Indeed, others have argued that by consuming such literature, we “forfeit part of your identity as a human being and concede your rational agency to an impersonal program that mimics and mocks humanity.”

© Getty Images

Question everything -

This strong statement is certainly one shared among authors and other creatives, who are urging us, once again, to question everything we are being served in the public forum.

© Getty Images

Humane confrontation -

Even in their demise, artists are still bringing a humane confrontation to the public, urging that they value their own intellect above misinformed, AI-generated content.

Sources: (TechHQ) (The Guardian) (Minding the Campus)

See also: Predicting deaths and reading minds: shocking things AI can already do

© Getty Images